Restriction on the use of the Chartered Accountant (SA) [CA(SA)] designation
The CA(SA) designation forms the cornerstone of the accountancy profession in South Africa. The designation is governed in accordance with the Chartered Accountants Designation Act 67 of 1993 (21Kb PDF). The purpose of the Act is to permit, regulate and restrict the use of certain designations to chartered accountants. To this end, persons who purport to be CA(SA)s, while in fact they are not, are guilty of a criminal offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding R20 000.
Any person using a designation, they are not to, should be reported to the Institute.
What if a member is both a Chartered Accountant South Africa (CA(SA) and a Registered Auditor (RA)?
There are instances where a member is both a CA(SA) and an RA. In these instances, SAICA will work with the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors (IRBA) which exercises professional authority over RAs in accordance with the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005 (154Kb PDF). In terms of the By-Laws (119Kb PDF), if, during the commission of an alleged offence, a member was registered both as a CA(SA) and an RA, and pursuant to receiving a complaint in respect of the member, the Institute is obliged to refer the complaint to the IRBA for investigation by the IRBA. This referral will then kick start a joint disciplinary process with the IRBA.
What is meant by the joint disciplinary process between SAICA and the IRBA?
In terms of the By-Laws (119Kb PDF), if a complaint relates to a member who is an RA, the complaint will be referred to the IRBA for investigation and resolution. On completion of the disciplinary process by the IRBA, where the IRBA imposes a sentence but does not involve the suspension or removal from the register of auditors, the Institute is obliged to accept the finding and sentence against such member. In the event that the IRBA suspends or removes a member from its register, the Institute will accept the finding of the IRBA but will determine its own sentence. Therefore, the disciplinary process against members of the Institute who are also RAs, will involve the Institute and the IRBA.
Visit the IRBA website at www.irba.co.za.
How to lodge a complaint
In terms of the By-Laws (119Kb PDF), a complaint must be a formal complaint in the form of an affidavit (291Kb PDF). All complaints must be sent to The Project Director: Legal Compliance and Discipline, either by:
- General mail: PO Box 59875, Kengray, 2100
- Hand delivery: Integritas, 7 Zulberg Close, Bruma Lake, 2198
- Email: firstname.lastname@example.org, or
- Fax: 011 621 6763.
How is the complaint dealt with?
The following outlines the basic process of the Institute's complaints procedure and disciplinary process:
- Upon receipt of a complaint, the Institute, through the office of the Project Director: Legal, Compliance and Discipline, will first verify whether the person complained against is a member of SAICA, and if that person is a member of the Institute, consider the allegations. If there is a prima facie contravention of the By-Laws (119Kb PDF), the person against whom the complaint is lodged will be notified of the complaint and afforded twenty-one (21) days to respond to the complaint.
- In certain instances the Institute may do away with the requirement that complainants should submit an affidavit.
- If the period within which to respond lapses without a response being received, or if a response is procured but is not satisfactory, then the matter will be referred either to the Institute's Professional Conduct Committee (PCC) (if the allegations relate to a general allegation of professional conduct), or the Professional Conduct Committee (TRECO) (PCC (TRECO)) (if the matter relates to conduct in respect of training or continuing professional development matters), or the Disciplinary Committee (DC) (if the matter relates to a serious allegation of misconduct).
- Where possible, SAICA shall, in its sole and absolute discretion, seek to apply alternative dispute resolution measures, such as mediation and/or arbitration. In the case of the latter, this will be in relation to training contracts between trainees and training officers) in an effort to exhaust all possible avenues prior to putting matters through one of the committees that adjudicate over matters (PCC, PCC (TRECO) or DC.
- In instances where an accused provides the Institute with a response to a complaint against him or her and permits the Institute to share his or her response with the complainant, the complainant will be offered twenty-one (21) days to respond. Thereafter the matter shall either be resolved or referred to the appropriate committee for adjudication.
Click here to see a schematic representation of the Institute's complaints procedure and disciplinary process .
What happens if a member is found guilty of an offence?
If found guilty the person against whom a complaint was lodged will either be:
- Suspended from membership
- Struck-off from membership, or
- Disqualified from applying for membership
Can a conviction or sentence be appealed?
Decisions of the PCC or PCC (TRECO) are subject to review by the DC. If the PCC has cautioned, reprimanded or fined a member, the member shall have the right to demand, within twenty-one (21) days after being notified in writing of the sentence given, that the matter be referred to the DC. The DC shall deal with the matter as a new complaint and shall, if it finds the accused guilty of the conduct complained of, be entitled to impose a sentence more severe than that imposed by the PCC. If an accused chooses to lodge an appeal in accordance with this provision, the penalty shall not take effect until the DC has dealt with the matter.
Can an accused be represented in a disciplinary hearing at the PCC?
After receiving a response to a complaint from the accused, the PCC shall be entitled to call upon the accused to appear before it to explain or elucidate, or discuss the matter, without prejudice to his or her rights. Only the PCC, not the accused, will be entitled to call for such a meeting and the accused will not be entitled to be represented at the meeting.
Can an accused be represented in a disciplinary hearing at the DC?
An accused is entitled to be represented at a disciplinary hearing including being represented by his or her attorney.
What is the role of the Project Director: Legal, Compliance and Discipline?
The office of the Project Director: Legal, Compliance and Discipline plays two crucial roles in the Institute's complaints procedure and disciplinary process. On the one hand, he or she has delegated authority from the Executive President of the Institute to administer, manage and co-ordinate the Institute's complaints procedure and disciplinary process, and on the other hand he or she fulfil the role of a committee secretariat for the PCC and the DC. Generally, he or she provides the necessary leadership and guidance to members and non-members on issues related to professional discipline.
The mission of the office of the Project Director: Legal, Compliance and Discipline is to contribute towards the maintenance of the integrity of the accountancy profession, by fostering, nurturing and maintaining a culture of professional standards and integrity compliance amongst members through the:
- Effective policing of professional standards, ethics and integrity and where breaches have taken place, punishing, and
- Effective enforcement of disciplinary rules and processes
The Project Director: Legal, Compliance and Discipline can be reached either by:
Is the Institute's complaints procedure and disciplinary process fair and transparent?
The Institute's complaints procedure and disciplinary process is based on the rules of justice. Though a disciplinary process is neither a civil nor a criminal process but a sui generis process, the processes followed satisfy the rules of justice in that they offer both the complainant and the accused the right to be heard and to present their case in a fair manner. In terms of the By-Laws (119Kb PDF), the findings of the DC are published on the Institute's website and publication, Accountancy SA.
Where can I get information about the Institute's complaints procedure and disciplinary process?
SAICA Constitution (92Kb PDF)
SAICA By-Laws (119Kb PDF)
Code of Professional Conduct (640Kb PDF)
Continuing Professional Development policy (200Kb PDF)
Qualifying Examination Regulations (100Kb PDF)
Chartered Accountants Designation Act 67 of 1993 (21Kb PDF)
Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005 (154Kb PDF)
IRBA website www.irba.co.za
Affidavit (Ref: 346430) (100Kb PDF)
Schematic drawing of complaints procedure and disciplinary process (100Kb PDF)
The following documents are relevant in the Institute's complaints procedure and disciplinary process:
Whom do you contact for more information?
For additional information on the Institute's complaints procedure and disciplinary process, or any other related matter, you can contact the following:
The Project Director: Legal, Compliance and Discipline
Tel: 011 621 6960
Fax: 011 621 6763